Why executive branches are best placed to gauge national security risks (opens original article in a new tab)

The article argues that executive branches, not courts, are best suited to assess national security risks, citing legal precedents in the U.S. and U.K. and explaining the rationale behind this distinction.

• Ronny Tong discusses the executive branch's role in national security risk assessments
• Courts in common law jurisdictions are not suited to determine national security issues
• U.S. and UK legal precedents support executive authority over national security risk assessments
• The article highlights the distinction between executive national security determinations and judicial adjudication