判決揭隱私3-2》侵害配偶權屬一般侵權 法界：揭露事證無涉隱私權 (opens original article in a new tab)
侵害配偶權判決書中揭露的對話紀錄屬事證，法界認為無侵害隱私權疑慮，法官需原汁原味引用事證。
- 侵害配偶權官司常涉及出軌等行為
- 判決書中揭露的對話紀錄屬事證，無侵害隱私權疑慮
- 法官引用事證時需原汁原味，不能刻意修飾
- 判決書揭露標準與一般侵權行為無異
Conversation
No comments yet
Threaded discussion is coming next — this is where the community conversation about this story will live.