Tate brothers seek judicial review of decision not to tell them accusers’ names (opens original article in a new tab)
Andrew and Tristan Tate are challenging the CPS's decision to withhold the names of their accusers, citing human rights concerns and the risk of social media exposure.
- Andrew and Tristan Tate are seeking a judicial review of the CPS's decision not to disclose the names of their accusers due to fears of social media exposure.
- The CPS claims there is a real risk of the accusers' identities being published or contacted by the Tates, potentially interfering with the administration of justice.
- The Tates' lawyers argue that withholding the accusers' names prejudices their right to a fair trial and breaches their human rights under the ECHR.
Conversation
No comments yet
Threaded discussion is coming next — this is where the community conversation about this story will live.