In the dock: Phala Phala case rests on circumstantial evidence, says defence as trial nears end (opens original article in a new tab)

The Phala Phala case, involving the theft of $580,000 from President Ramaphosa's farm, hinges on circumstantial evidence as the defense challenges the state's claims of direct involvement by the accused.

• The Phala Phala case relies on circumstantial evidence, with the defense arguing the state lacks direct proof linking the accused to the burglary.
• Cellphone records and financial transactions are central to the state's case, but the defense claims they only show proximity, not involvement.
• Witnesses' changing testimonies and allegations of police pressure weaken the state's evidence, according to the defense.