Donaldson sex abuse accusers 'not sufficiently reliable' for a guilty verdict, jury told (opens original article in a new tab)

The defense argued that the two women accusing Sir Jeffrey Donaldson of sexual abuse were not reliable enough for a guilty verdict, citing inconsistencies and omissions in their testimonies.

• Defense barrister argued complainants were not reliable for a guilty verdict
• Complainant A's evidence was described as unreliable and inconsistent
• Complainant B's evidence also had significant issues