Donaldson sex abuse accusers 'not sufficiently reliable' for a guilty verdict, jury told (opens original article in a new tab)
The defense argues the two women accusing Sir Jeffrey Donaldson of sexual abuse are not reliable enough for a guilty verdict, citing inconsistencies and omissions in their testimonies.
- Defense barrister argues complainants are not reliable for guilty verdict
- Complainant A's evidence described as unreliable and inconsistent
- Sir Jeffrey Donaldson denies all 18 sex abuse charges
- Lady Eleanor Donaldson faces trial of the facts due to mental health issues
- Complainant B's evidence also questioned for reliability
Conversation
No comments yet
Threaded discussion is coming next — this is where the community conversation about this story will live.